How does cognitive warfare target information security professionals online, on social media, and at work?
Why Treadstone 71 Cognitive Warfighter training is essential to your success
Social Engineering Attacks: Information security professionals are prime targets for social engineering attacks, including phishing, spear phishing, and vishing (voice phishing). These attacks often use tailored messages that leverage professional jargon, making them more believable. They aim to deceive professionals into revealing sensitive information, like login credentials, which can compromise entire networks.
Evidence: The 2020 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report found that social engineering was involved in 22% of breaches, and targeted individuals are often those with system access.
Exploitation of Professional Networks: Platforms like LinkedIn can be weaponized to map organizational structures and identify key individuals. A well-crafted profile can lure security professionals into connecting, leading to reconnaissance or direct attacks.
Evidence: In 2017, the cybersecurity firm SecureWorks discovered a massive LinkedIn espionage campaign believed to be conducted by Iranian hackers, targeting professionals in various sectors.
Deep Fakes and Disinformation: Deep fakes synthetic media where someone's likeness is manipulated and used to fabricate videos or audio recordings to deceive or discredit professionals. Deep fakes compromise personal integrity and corporate trust.
Evidence: A 2019 Wall Street Journal report described an incident where deep fake audio was used to impersonate a CEO, resulting in a fraudulent transfer of $243,000.
Insider Threat Manipulation: Cognitive warfare tactics can be applied to manipulate employees within an organization to act as insider threats, either wittingly or unwittingly. These tactics can include blackmail, influence campaigns, or other forms of manipulation.
Evidence: A 2018 survey by Cybersecurity Insiders reported that 90% of organizations felt vulnerable to insider attacks.
Personal Data Leverage: Personal information, like those on social media, can be weaponized for blackmail or public shaming, pushing professionals into unethical or unsafe practices.
Evidence: The Ashley Madison breach in 2015 led to the release of users' details, some of whom were information security professionals, resulting in blackmail and reputational damage.
Erosion of Trust Through Disinformation: Spreading false information or rumors about vulnerabilities, breaches, or even the reputation of professionals can erode trust and cause internal conflict within an organization.
Evidence: A 2020 study by the University of Baltimore highlighted how disinformation undermines organizational trust, which is particularly critical in information security settings.
Exploiting Open Source Intelligence (OSINT): Personal and professional information available online can be collated to create targeted attack vectors, utilizing what is openly shared in research papers, online forums, or even casual social media posts.
Credential Stuffing on Industry Forums: Cyber professionals often partake in specialized forums or closed social media groups. Attackers can use previously breached credentials to impersonate professionals, spreading misinformation or collecting sensitive info.
Evidence: In 2019, the cybersecurity company Akamai reported that 90% of login attempts in online forums, often frequented by professionals, were credential-stuffing attacks.
Watering Hole Attacks: Websites frequented by cybersecurity experts can be compromised to deliver malware to specific targets.
Evidence: In 2020, ESET Research discovered a watering hole attack aimed at Hong Kong protestors and possibly foreign journalists visiting websites altered by the China-linked group, Ocean Buffalo.
Psychological Profiling for Spear Phishing: Cognitive warfare includes understanding the psychological makeup of targets. Custom-crafted messages, informed by a person's likes, hobbies, or even political leanings, make spear-phishing more effective.
Evidence: The 2016 hack of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) used spear-phishing emails tailored to the recipients' political interests.
Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Exploits: As these technologies become prevalent, they offer new avenues for social engineering, such as "in-game" phishing attempts.
Evidence: Kaspersky reported in 2018 that attempts to direct users to phishing sites from gaming platforms had increased by 30% compared to the previous year.
Real-time Manipulation via AI Chatbots: Advanced chatbots can engage in real-time conversations with targets, coaxing them into revealing sensitive information.
Evidence: Research by NortonLifeLock in 2021 identified a rise in chatbot-powered scams mimicking human interaction convincingly.
Correlation of Work and Personal Life: By cross-referencing professional and personal social media profiles, attackers can compile a more comprehensive profile of the target, used for highly sophisticated attacks.
Evidence: A 2021 McAfee report highlighted how cybercriminals combine information from multiple sources to improve the success rate of targeted attacks.
Staged Distractions: Creating a minor cybersecurity incident to distract professionals, only to simultaneously launch a more significant attack.
Evidence: FireEye's 2019 M-Trends report documented instances where distraction was used to facilitate a secondary, more covert intrusion.
Tailgating and Physical Infiltration: While this may be more traditional, it's still relevant. Gaining physical access to workspaces under the guise of being a fellow employee can lead to various forms of information compromise.
Evidence: According to an ISACA report from 2019, 35% of surveyed organizations reported experiencing tailgating attempts, a physical security risk often overlooked.